
Moderators: Mug UK, Zorro 2, Moderator Team
ijor wrote:Regarding the Pasti images, you might need to use the undocumented diag Code 16 in the Pasti Config Option pane. I'll provide later a correct 1.3 Pasti image that doesn't need this option. For 1.5 it is more difficult since we don't have a flux level dump of that version.
MiggyMog wrote:I hope the attached are working ok. I didn't have time to test. I had a heck of a time getting my cosmosex to cooperate. Here goes:-
troed wrote:MiggyMog wrote:I hope the attached are working ok. I didn't have time to test. I had a heck of a time getting my cosmosex to cooperate. Here goes:-
Boots up nicely in latest Hatari dev build here(TOS 1.62, will bomb out with TOS 2.06)
troed wrote:MiggyMog wrote:I hope the attached are working ok. I didn't have time to test. I had a heck of a time getting my cosmosex to cooperate. Here goes:-
Boots up nicely in latest Hatari dev build here(TOS 1.62, will bomb out with TOS 2.06)
Thanks!
/Troed
dlfrsilver wrote:and thanks to me for contacting frederic bautista, who told us how the protection is working
Brume wrote:Dam, how can you forget Amiga-man, Maartau?
JimDrew wrote:SCP already looks at the target drive and adjusts the bitcells so they are the same length (in time) for the rotational speed of the target drive. This was necessary because sometimes people dump disks with a 360 RPM drive and then want to write them back on a 300 RPM drive. I typically see +/- 1 bitcell variance when read/writing on the same drive.
Code: Select all
...... Original .......... Copy ............. Diff in # of transitions
===============================================================
Track 0: samples: 46654. samples: 46665 11
Track 1: samples: 38500. samples: 38518 18
Track 2: samples: 38637. samples: 38664 27
Track 3: samples: 38082. samples: 38114 32
Track 4: samples: 38448. samples: 38474 26
JimDrew wrote:Hmm... I don't see this much variance with any setup I have here. How are you determining the number of samples?
Estrayk wrote:Hi troed, doesnt runs in Falcon coz AS doesn't run on it or because your crack doesnt work in Falcon?
Just curiosity,
Steven Seagal wrote:Maybe the STOP is handled differently?
npomarede wrote:Steven Seagal wrote:Maybe the STOP is handled differently?
Yes, stop on 68020/68030 behaves "correcty", no test of S bit in the new SR (it was checked by Toni Willen on Amiga).
But even so, I think the cracked version made by Troed doesn't work on Falcon (the TOS is not supported I think)
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests