leech wrote:I kind of thought that was the point? Doesn't the super videl pretty much require a CT6x? And I thought the CT60e was supposed to basically be better/newer than the CT60 and CT63.
I need one so I can write up my comparison between Amiga+latest OS on 68060 vs Atari Falcon + Latest OS on 68060.
leech wrote:And I thought the CT60e was supposed to basically be better/newer than the CT60 and CT63.
instream wrote:There are improvements besides mechanical ones:
Willy has rearranged the order of the ABE, 060, SDR on the address and data lines of the CT60 100MHz bus, and managed to shorten the length of the bus heavily. This together with impedance matching using series resistors at the correct places has improved the signal integrity so that we can remove the extra waitstates in the SuperVidel VHDL code when receiving bursts (MOVE16). Maybe we shouldn't promise too much now, but a MOVE16 burst takes currently something like 9+3+3+3 cycles due to poor signal integrity, and with the CT60e we can probably go down to 9+1+1+1. This means that a 100MHz bus would give 133 MB/s instead of 89 MB/s.
HuggyOne76 wrote:I don't understand... A lot of people wrote their interest on this topic. And now, the cards are reserved for people who sent email ??? But where was this information ? I'm so disappointed...
1st1 wrote:Maybe this one, up to 160W?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests