Moderators: simonsunnyboy, thothy, Moderator Team


alexh wrote:What's the changelog?


alexh wrote:Yo Mr.Styckx nice to see you again. I still use MYST almost every day!





alexh wrote:What's the general direction of Hatari going? Is accurate STe compatibility the main goal?
Or does the work usually take a "what ever takes my interest" sort of direction?
How close is Hatari to say STeeM or SainT? (which I understand are limited to Windows platform)

npomarede wrote:I would say that thanks to uae cpu core, hatari has a very solid base to emulate the 68000

alexh wrote:npomarede wrote:I would say that thanks to uae cpu core, hatari has a very solid base to emulate the 68000
Does the UAE CPU core offer the cycle accuracy you need for demos?
I like that the GUI is also portable being written in SDL


alexh wrote:I understand what you mean.
Didn't Ijor explain a problem that had bugged the original author of WinSTon, that on the real 68k some instructions vary their timing relative to their surrounding instructions? Or is this the same thing?


thothy wrote:Well said, Nicolas. I have hardly anything to add. I just want to stress the Falcon emulation, too. Neither Steem nor Saint emulate the Falcon. Aranym does, but has a different goal, providing rather a next-generation virtual machine for GEM applications than a cycle-accurate emulation. When you want to run Falcon games or demos, Hatari is the only promising candidate, I think, though there is still a lot to do until it gets really, really usable for this job.


Users browsing this forum: CommonCrawl [Bot] and 0 guests